Profile Overview
Six assessments · integrated portrait · May 2026
Enneagram
RHETI v2.5 · The Riso-Hudson Enneagram Type Indicator
Core drive: to be loved and indispensable. Core fear: being loved only for what you do, not who you are. The 8 wing adds considerable force — this is not a soft or deferential helper. The 2w8 ("The Benefactor") gives big, expects loyalty, and can become controlling when generosity goes unrecognised.
Five types tied at 15 — breadth of resonance common in highly self-aware people.
Type Twos belong to the Heart (or Feeling) Triad, meaning their primary orientation to the world is emotional. Where Head types (5, 6, 7) lead with analysis and Gut types (8, 9, 1) lead with instinct, Heart types lead with feeling — and specifically with their sense of how others feel about them. For a Two, the central question running in the background of almost every interaction is: Am I loved? Am I wanted here?
The Two's strategy is to become indispensable. If I give enough, help enough, anticipate needs accurately enough, I will secure the love I need. This is not cynical or transactional in the conscious mind — Twos genuinely love giving. But underneath that genuine generosity is a deep fear: that if they stopped giving, they might not be wanted at all. The psychological work of a mature Two is separating "I am loved because I exist" from "I am loved because I am useful."
At your best (integrated, healthy Level 1–3): Genuinely altruistic. Emotionally perceptive in a way that allows extraordinary care for others while maintaining a clear sense of self. Knows their own needs and can articulate them. Gives freely without keeping score. Makes people feel genuinely seen and valued in ways that are rare.
At average health (Levels 4–6): Helping begins to carry a subtle expectation of return — not explicit, but felt. Flattery and people-pleasing can emerge. Starts monitoring others' appreciation and can feel unappreciated even when others are grateful. "I do so much for people and no one does anything for me" is the characteristic average-Two complaint. Self-deception about own needs is strong at this level.
Under stress (Levels 7–9, moving to disintegration point at 8): The warmth inverts into control and demand. "After everything I've done for you" is the disintegrated-Two phrase. Can become manipulative, possessive, and emotionally volatile. Your RHETI data shows Type 8 as your wing and your stress point — which means stress activates the confrontational, dominating energy of an Eight. This is confirmed by your Anger 62% and Impulse dysregulation: High scores.
Wings are adjacent types on the Enneagram circle that flavor the primary type without replacing it. A 2w8 is still fundamentally a Two — motivated by love and connection — but with a significant infusion of Eight energy: self-confidence, directness, power, and a strong resistance to being controlled or diminished.
The Eight's core strategy is to dominate rather than be dominated. They avoid vulnerability because vulnerability feels dangerous. They project force because strength feels safe. This is the Gut Triad's response to a world perceived as challenging: meet it with power before it can overpower you.
What the 8 wing adds to your Two: Force where a typical Two would defer. You don't shrink from conflict — you can move toward it. You expect people to meet you where you are. You have strong opinions and state them. You are generous but not pushover-generous; there's a sense that your generosity is chosen, not compelled. You can be commanding. You care about people but you do not perform softness. This is the "Benefactor" energy of the 2w8 — someone who gives big and has strong expectations about loyalty and reciprocity in return.
The shadow of the 8 wing in your specific data: When the Two's fear of being unneeded is triggered — particularly in professional contexts where hierarchy is involved, where you feel evaluated or unseen — the Eight energy can take over in ways that escalate rather than resolve. The sequence documented in your attachment data (dismissive-avoidant at work) and impulse dysregulation profile shows this pattern: emotional distance followed by sharp reactive force when the distance is violated.
Type Ones are driven by a need for integrity and correctness. They have an internal "inner critic" that monitors actions against an ideal standard and generates guilt or self-directed anger when the standard isn't met. At their best, Ones are principled, thorough, and genuinely ethical — the person others can trust to do what's right even when it's hard.
Why this resonates for you: Your VIA strengths of Judgment (#3), Honesty (#6), and Bravery (#4) carry strong One-resonance — these are the virtues a healthy One prioritizes. Your Analytical #8 (CliftonStrengths) and your FSIQ 142 support the One's attention to correctness and quality. Your 16 on Type 1 suggests these values are real even if the One isn't your primary driver.
The One-Two combination: A Two's love of people combined with a One's love of quality and correctness produces someone who holds others and work to high standards, not as judgment, but as care. You want things to be done right because you care. The shadow: One's inner critic can merge with Two's fear of being inadequate and create a particularly painful self-critical loop — especially when ADHD creates the gap between the One's standards and actual output.
Every Enneagram type can express with either of its two neighboring types as a dominant wing. A Type 2 can be 2w1 (Helper with Reformer wing) or 2w8 (Helper with Challenger wing). These create meaningfully different personalities. The 2w1 is typically softer, more self-critical, and oriented toward service as a moral obligation. The 2w8 — your type — is more assertive, confident, expects reciprocity, and carries a kind of gravitational force that the 2w1 lacks. Many people have both wings present to some degree, but one typically dominates. Your score of 19 for Type 8 and 16 for Type 1 confirms clear 8-wing dominance with meaningful 1 resonance.
CliftonStrengths 34
Gallup · Full 34 assessment · May 2026
Zero Influencing despite Assertiveness 90% is a meaningful finding. You lead through insight and relationship — influence is the outcome, not the mechanism.
Strategic Thinking dominance means your most natural energy goes toward understanding. You process, analyze, and generate possibilities instinctively. The world of ideas is energizing, not draining.
Strong Relationship Building means your thinking is never abstract — it's always anchored in the people involved. You don't just see the system; you see who's in it and what they need.
Zero Influencing doesn't mean you lack influence — Assertiveness 90% and Bravery #4 VIA confirm you have real force. It means you don't lead by winning people over, competing, or selling. You lead by being right and by people trusting you.
Strategic is not a generic term here — it refers to a specific cognitive talent: the ability to see patterns where others see complexity, and to quickly sort through multiple possible scenarios to identify the most promising path. People high in Strategic instinctively ask "what if" questions and are energized by finding their way through complexity. This is not the same as planning (which is Deliberative) or organizing (which is Arranger). Strategic is about seeing through the noise to what matters.
How it shows up for you: You spot what others miss — the hidden assumption in an argument, the unacknowledged risk in a plan, the pattern connecting seemingly unrelated events. Combined with Intellect and Analytical, this produces someone who can construct rigorous mental models quickly and stress-test them in real time. Your WMI 145 provides the cognitive scaffolding that makes Strategic operate at full power.
Relator describes people who find their greatest satisfaction in deep, genuine relationships rather than broad networks. While an Includer or Woo talent seeks many connections, the Relator seeks fewer, deeper ones. They are energized by genuine intimacy and mutual understanding, not by meeting new people. The Relator talent explains why you would rather have three close friends than thirty acquaintances.
How it shows up for you: Your romantic attachment (avoidance 1.3 — barely registering) confirms Relator operating at full health. You build trust slowly and deliberately, but once built, it's deep and durable. Combined with your Two's drive for connection and your Empathy theme, Relator means you understand people over time in an unusually thorough way. You track where people are in their lives. You remember details. You show up.
People with Futuristic are energized by vision — by imagining what could be possible. They are natural dreamers who inspire others with vivid pictures of a better tomorrow. This is distinct from Ideation (which is about connections between ideas) and Strategic (which is about pathways). Futuristic is specifically about the horizon — the pull of what's not yet here.
How it shows up for you: You live naturally in possibility. Ideas about the future are vivid and energizing. Combined with Strategic, you don't just dream — you can see a path to the dream. The caution is that this makes the present feel flat or insufficient by comparison, which can fuel restlessness. This is also one of the four forces working against present-moment presence identified in your Synthesis.
Harmony (#34), Includer (#33), Deliberative (#32), Context (#31) at the bottom is a coherent pattern. You don't seek consensus for its own sake. You don't feel compelled to include everyone. You aren't risk-averse in a classical way. You don't anchor heavily to history or precedent. These aren't weaknesses — they're the profile of someone who leads through insight rather than accommodation. The absence of Harmony and Includer in particular confirms the Enneagram data: you're comfortable with productive friction, and you don't need everyone in the room to be comfortable to make a decision.
Cognitive Profile
Cognitive Metrics CORE · FSIQ 142 ±5 · 99.74th percentile
Note: all scores shown as distance from population mean (100) on a 160-point scale for visualization. Every score above is at or above the 93rd percentile.
144
What it measures: The breadth and depth of vocabulary, the ability to reason with language, to understand verbal concepts and relationships, and to express ideas with precision. Reflects crystallized intelligence — knowledge and verbal skills built over time through reading, learning, and conversation.
What 144 means: 99.87th percentile — roughly 1 in 750 people. Language is your primary cognitive tool. You think in words as naturally as most people think in images. Complex ideas that are difficult for most people to articulate are both easy to understand and easy to express for you. This directly powers Strategic (pattern language), Intellection (verbal processing), and your VIA Perspective (#8) strength.
145
What it measures: The ability to hold multiple pieces of information in mind simultaneously while actively processing them. Working memory is the mental "workspace" — the capacity to juggle multiple variables without losing track. It's one of the most consequential cognitive measures, closely correlated with academic performance, professional achievement, and complex reasoning.
What 145 means + the ADHD significance: This is your highest index score and one of the most clinically remarkable aspects of your profile. ADHD almost universally depresses working memory. A WMI of 145 in someone with ADHD is genuinely unusual and likely explains your capacity for complex multi-thread thinking even when executive function is compromised. This is a true cognitive superpower — and the reason your cognitive floor is higher than most people's ceiling even on a bad ADHD day.
134
What it measures: The ability to perceive, analyze, and mentally manipulate visual and spatial information. Includes tasks like mentally rotating 3D objects, reading maps, and perceiving spatial relationships accurately.
What 134 means: 99th percentile — exceptional despite being your third-highest score. Strong visual-spatial intelligence supports pattern recognition in non-verbal domains, contributes to your Appreciation of Beauty #1 VIA (perceiving composition and spatial harmony), and may underlie your ability to mentally model complex multi-variable systems as though seeing them in space rather than reading them linearly.
132
What it measures: The ability to think logically in novel situations — using induction, deduction, and abstract reasoning on problems where prior knowledge doesn't help. This is closest to what people think of as "raw intelligence": the ability to figure things out from first principles.
What 132 means: 98th percentile — very strong. You can reason your way through new problems effectively. Combined with VCI 144 (verbal scaffolding for the reasoning), your ability to construct and test logical arguments in novel domains is exceptional. This powers the Analytical and Judgment strengths.
126
What it measures: The speed and accuracy of basic cognitive operations — how quickly the brain can process simple information. Involves tasks like quickly identifying matching symbols, scanning for targets, or performing rapid mental operations. Reflects processing efficiency of the neural substrate.
What 126 means in context: Still 96th percentile — genuinely fast. But it's the relative valley in a profile where most indices are at the 99th percentile. This gap is meaningful: it reflects a depth-over-speed processing style. You do your best thinking through incubation, not real-time reaction. The ADHD interaction is real — low-stimulation repetitive tasks that rely on processing speed are exactly where ADHD most impairs throughput. Don't misread this as slow thinking; read it as deep thinking.
122
What it measures: The ability to reason with numerical concepts, perform mental arithmetic, understand quantitative relationships, and apply mathematical logic.
What 122 means: 93rd percentile — top 7% of the population. But the lowest index by a meaningful margin. This confirms a verbal/conceptual cognitive style over a mathematical/computational one. You reason best through language, systems, and human frameworks — not formulas. This is consistent with your VIA Wisdom dominance and your CliftonStrengths profile (zero Quantitative or Analytical math-focused themes). This doesn't impair your ability to reason about quantitative problems — it just means you do it through conceptual frameworks, not numbers directly.
The average person has an FSIQ of 100 and index scores clustered in the 85–115 range. An FSIQ of 142 means that in a room of 384 people, you have the highest score. More meaningfully: the gap between VCI/WMI (144–145) and QRI/PSI (122–126) represents a 23-point intra-profile spread — which is itself in the top 5% of intra-profile variability. You are not uniformly "smart across everything"; you are extraordinarily strong in specific domains and very strong (but not extraordinary) in others. This makes you a specialist of a certain kind: verbal, systemic, empathic, incubative.
Big Five Personality
IPIP-NEO-300 · 300 questions · canonical results · May 2026
What Openness measures: The tendency to seek and appreciate new experiences, ideas, and aesthetic stimuli. High scorers are imaginative, curious, intellectually adventurous, and sensitive to beauty. They tend to hold unconventional values and are comfortable with ambiguity. Low scorers prefer the familiar, conventional, and concrete.
What 87% means for you: You are in the top 13% of the population for openness. Ideas are intrinsically rewarding. You don't need external justification to explore a concept — the exploration itself is satisfying. You notice beauty, complexity, and depth where others don't. This directly fuels your VIA top strength (Appreciation of Beauty), your Enneagram growth path toward Four (depth of inner experience), and virtually every theme in your CliftonStrengths profile.
The facets in detail:
Emotionality 97% — near-ceiling, clinically significant: This facet measures the degree to which you are emotionally aware, emotionally responsive, and feel emotions deeply and consciously. At 97%, you are among the most emotionally perceptive people who take this test. This is both your most powerful relational asset (Empathy #10, Two's relational core) and your most significant ongoing energy cost. You experience the emotional texture of every interaction. You cannot switch this off. Decompression is not optional.
Intellect 95%: This facet specifically measures love of abstract thinking and intellectual exploration — the pleasure of ideas. At 95%, intellectual engagement is intrinsically rewarding rather than instrumental. You don't think to solve problems; you think because thinking feels good. This is both an enormous asset and a source of potential divergence from the world of execution and delivery.
What Conscientiousness measures: The tendency toward self-discipline, organization, goal-directedness, reliability, and deliberate planning. High scorers are dependable, organized, and achievement-oriented. It is one of the strongest predictors of career success and longevity across all studies.
What 70% means — and the ADHD context: 70% is above average — but must be read against your ADHD diagnosis. ADHD is, in part, a disorder of executive function that directly depresses the behavioral output that Conscientiousness measures. That your score is still at the 70th percentile despite ADHD suggests your underlying values and orientation toward conscientiousness are genuinely high — the neurological gap is between what you value (Achievement-striving 90%, Self-efficacy 90%) and what you can consistently execute.
The split between Self-efficacy (90%), Achievement-striving (90%) and Orderliness (45%) is the ADHD profile made visible in data. You believe in your ability to achieve (Self-efficacy), you deeply want to achieve (Achievement-striving), but the structural scaffolding of daily orderliness and routine is difficult to maintain neurologically (Orderliness 45%). This is not lack of trying — it's the specific shape of ADHD-combined presentation.
What Extraversion measures: The tendency to experience positive emotions in social settings, to seek stimulation and engagement from the external world, to be energized by people rather than drained. Includes facets of warmth, sociability, assertiveness, activity level, excitement-seeking, and positive emotionality.
What 73% means: Meaningfully extraverted — but the facet breakdown is more interesting than the headline number. Gregariousness (50%) is at exactly the median, meaning you're not a joiner or someone who seeks large social settings. But Assertiveness (90%) and Cheerfulness (85%) are near-ceiling. This is the Two's social profile: warm and positive, not necessarily drawn to crowds, but strongly assertive and genuinely joyful. You don't need the room — but you command it when you're in it.
Assertiveness 90% is one of the highest single facet scores in your entire profile. You speak up, take charge of situations, and have no difficulty expressing your views. This confirms the Eight wing's presence and Bravery #4 VIA, and directly contradicts any reading of the Two as soft or self-effacing. This is the 2w8 in one number.
What Agreeableness measures: The tendency toward cooperation, trust, empathy, and interpersonal harmony. High scorers are warm, caring, and conflict-averse. Low scorers are competitive, skeptical, and comfortable with interpersonal friction.
What 62% means: Above average but not high — and the facet breakdown explains why the headline is misleading. Altruism (85%) and Sympathy (77%) are genuinely high, confirming deep care for others. But Modesty (22%) and Cooperation (50%) create a counterweight. You care, but you don't defer. You're warm, but you hold your ground. This is one of the clearest data signatures of the 2w8 in the entire profile.
Modesty 22% — lowest-scoring facet: Modesty measures the tendency to downplay one's achievements and abilities, to avoid claiming superiority. At 22%, you clearly hold a high opinion of your own capabilities — confirmed by your self-report ("believe I am better than others" — very accurate) and Assertiveness 90%. This is consistent with the Eight wing and with high self-esteem on both Self-competence dimensions. This is not arrogance per se; it's accurate self-assessment that happens to be unusually unconcealed. The ongoing work is holding this confidence consciously in contexts where it can read as dismissiveness or lack of humility.
What Neuroticism measures: The tendency to experience negative emotional states — anxiety, moodiness, irritability, emotional instability, and susceptibility to stress. High scorers experience more negative affect and are more reactive to stressors. Low scorers are calm, emotionally stable, and less reactive. Note: High Neuroticism does not mean mental illness, and low Neuroticism does not mean mental health.
What 44% means: Slightly below the population average — indicating genuine emotional stability as a baseline. You are not a chronically anxious or moody person. This is consistent with your high self-esteem, your secure attachment in chosen relationships, and Cheerfulness 85%. The facet breakdown, however, reveals important nuance.
The asymmetry in the facets: Depression (27%) and Vulnerability (27%) are genuinely low — you don't experience persistent low mood or feel easily overwhelmed. But Anxiety (60%) and Anger (62%) are above average and mutually reinforcing. This is the specific emotional signature of the impulse anger cascade documented in your attachment data: stable baseline + specific triggers → acute anger spike. Not a chronic mood disorder; a specific reactivity pattern with identifiable triggers.
Immoderation 62% † (ADHD context): This facet measures the tendency to act on impulses and have difficulty resisting temptation. Must be read in ADHD context — impulse control is an executive function directly affected by ADHD. Self-Regulation #20 VIA (low) is the values expression of the same struggle. This is a management challenge, not a character defect.
VIA Character Strengths
VIA Institute on Character · All 24 ranked · May 2026
Wisdom dominance is striking — five of the six Wisdom virtues appear in your top 10. This is unusual and meaningful. Note that Love and Kindness (Humanity) appearing in positions 11–19, not the top 10, is actually healthy for a Two — it suggests genuine rather than performed care, coexisting with equally strong intellectual and courageous drives.
This strength describes people who notice and are genuinely moved by excellence wherever they encounter it — not just in art, but in a perfectly constructed argument, a skillfully executed repair, a moment of exceptional kindness, or a well-designed system. It's not aesthetic snobbery — it's a deep permeability to quality. Research by Peterson and Seligman shows that people high in this strength experience more awe, more elevation (the emotion of being uplifted by witnessing virtue), and more moments of transcendence in everyday life.
For you specifically: This is your highest-ranking value — the thing that feels most like "you" when you express it. Combined with Imagination 92% and Artistic Interests 85%, you don't just appreciate beauty intellectually; you feel it as a physical and emotional response. This is a real constraint on what work can sustain you: tasks without aesthetic or ethical quality will eventually feel hollow, no matter how well they use your intellectual gifts. This is not a preference — it's a core fuel source.
Living it more fully: Deliberately seek and articulate what you find excellent. Share it — the Two's drive toward connection means your appreciation of beauty is most alive when expressed to someone you trust. Create conditions where the quality of what you produce has room to matter to you.
Attachment Profile
Attachment Project · ECR-based · May 2026
| Context | Style | Avoidance | Anxiety | What this means |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| General | Secure | 3.5 — Medium | 2.3 — Low | Healthy baseline |
| Romantic | Secure | 1.3 — Low | 2.7 — Low | Exceptionally secure; near-floor avoidance |
| Mother | Secure | 1.3 — Low | 1.0 — Low | Fully secure; extremely low anxiety |
| Father | Secure | 1.3 — Low | 1.0 — Low | Fully secure; extremely low anxiety |
| At Work | Dismissive-Avoidant | 4.2 — Medium | 2.7 — Low | Sharp avoidance increase; 3x romantic context |
Secure attachment is not a given — it's a real and meaningful outcome, especially for people with the Two's core fear of being unlovable. Secure attachment in adulthood is associated with: greater relationship satisfaction, more effective conflict resolution, higher resilience under stress, and better physical and mental health outcomes. Research consistently shows it can be earned through therapy, self-work, and sustained positive relationships even if early attachment was more complicated.
Romantic avoidance of 1.3 is essentially the floor of the scale. This means you are as close to someone else's emotional world as a person can be without anxiety or defensive distance. For a 2w8 whose Wing 8 resists vulnerability, this is a significant finding — it suggests you've done real work on the fear of being known.
What it means: In relationships you've chosen, you're fully available. You can be relied on. You don't create distance when things get hard. This is genuine psychological health.
Dismissive-Avoidant attachment is characterized by self-sufficiency as a defense — "I don't need anyone." In Dismissive-Avoidant people, there's a tendency to minimize the importance of relationships, to disengage emotionally when closeness feels threatening, and to rely on self-sufficiency as an emotional armor. Anxiety remains low (2.7) because the avoidance protects against the anxiety — by not letting anyone close enough to trigger it.
The 1.3 → 4.2 gap: The jump from romantic avoidance (1.3) to work avoidance (4.2) is nearly three full points on the ECR scale — this is not a subtle shift. In professional contexts involving unchosen relationships, hierarchy, or evaluation of competence, your emotional distance increases markedly. The Eight wing's resistance to being controlled or evaluated, the Two's fear of being found inadequate professionally, and the ADHD-created gap between capacity and output likely all converge here.
What to watch: Dismissive-Avoidant at work can appear as self-sufficiency (positive) but also as reluctance to show vulnerability when struggling, difficulty asking for help, and periodic reactive pushback when the armor is penetrated. This is likely the least-worked thread in your current development.
Self-esteem research (Tafarodi and Swann) distinguishes between Self-liking (evaluating yourself positively as a person) and Self-competence (believing you're capable and effective). Both being simultaneously high is relatively rare in the general population and represents genuine psychological health.
For an Enneagram Two whose core fear is being fundamentally unlovable, high Self-liking is especially meaningful. It suggests that the work of believing "I am worthy of love because I exist" — not just because of what I do — is genuinely internalized, at least at the conscious level. This is probably hard-won.
Impulse specifically High: The DERS (Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale) measures multiple dimensions of emotional management. Only one — Impulse — is elevated. This is a narrow and specific finding: the difficulty is not in understanding your emotions (Clarity: Med), not in accepting them (Nonacceptance: Med), and not in staying goal-directed (Goals: Med). It's specifically in controlling behavior once an emotion is triggered. This is the executive function signature of ADHD.
Clinical & Personal Context
Background that shapes how all other results should be read
ADHD — Adult, Combined Presentation. Diagnosed and partially managed with medication, with a deliberate preference for lower doses. ADHD affects executive function — task initiation, sustained attention, impulse inhibition, and working memory activation — in ways that create a real gap between cognitive capacity and day-to-day output. This gap is neurological in origin, not motivational.
Importantly: Working Memory at 145 (99th percentile) is unusually high for ADHD and likely compensates significantly, enabling complex parallel thinking even when attention regulation is difficult. The ADHD presents most acutely in low-stimulation, routine, or structured environments — and least in high-interest, novel, or complex domains where hyperfocus can activate.
Several scores across assessments that might otherwise read as character issues — Perseverance (#24 VIA), Self-Regulation (#20 VIA), Orderliness (45% Big Five), Impulse dysregulation (High, Attachment) — should be read in this context. These are management challenges around a real neurological difference, not deficits of will or values.
Maternal family history of bipolar-spectrum mood disorders. This is relevant clinical context for understanding mood regulation patterns, emotional intensity, and the potential interaction between ADHD management and mood stability — not a diagnosis or prediction. Clinicians working with this profile should be aware of it when considering medication approaches and mood pattern monitoring.
Anxiety and stress. Recurring patterns of stress and anxiety, with periods of low mood that can shade toward depression-adjacent states. These are not constant — baseline affect is genuinely positive (Cheerfulness 85%, Depression 27%) — but they surface under pressure and are worth monitoring. The Big Five Anxiety facet at 60% captures this accurately: present and real, but not overwhelming or persistent.
Anger and impulse expression. Anger has been a recurring pattern since childhood, less frequent in adulthood but still present. In its most acute form, it manifests as physical outbursts directed at objects — never at people. Chris is fully aware that this distinction, while meaningful, does not eliminate the emotional toll on anyone present, particularly his wife, who bears witness to these moments. This pattern is consistent with the Impulse dysregulation (High) finding in the Attachment assessment, Anger 62% in the Big Five, and the Enneagram Two's stress movement toward Eight. It is being actively worked on.
Emotional intensity more broadly. Emotionality at 97% (Big Five) means emotional experience is deep, wide, and fully conscious. This is both a profound strength — genuine empathy, rich inner life, authentic connection — and a significant source of cognitive and emotional load. Decompression time is not a luxury for this profile; it is maintenance.
The combination of ADHD, family history of bipolar-spectrum patterns, high emotional intensity, and the specific anger/impulse profile described above warrants ongoing attention to whether the current treatment approach is fully optimised — not because anything is acutely wrong, but because these elements interact in ways worth ensuring are accounted for comprehensively.
The high self-esteem across both self-liking and self-competence, and the secure attachment in all chosen intimate relationships, are genuine indicators of psychological health and meaningful therapeutic progress. The remaining edges — the work attachment gap, the impulse anger cascade, and the ADHD-self-criticism loop — are where the current growth work lives.
Synthesis
Integrated portrait across all six assessments
Personal Journal
Mood tracking · emotional log · therapy prep · Chris Barnett
Profile Comparison
Once Lauren and T complete their assessments, this view will allow you to compare profiles side-by-side — compatibility insights, potential friction areas, and AI-powered relationship analysis tools.